As the NHL trade deadline looms, the Colorado Avalanche find themselves at a crossroads, and the decisions they make could define their season. With depth being a pressing concern, fans are buzzing with questions about potential moves. Let’s dive into some of the most intriguing scenarios, starting with a bold proposal that’s sure to spark debate.
But here’s where it gets controversial... Sol asks whether adding Cody Glass and Brendan Dillon from the Devils would make sense for the Avalanche. At first glance, it seems like a straightforward question, but the devil is in the details. While the Avalanche undeniably need depth, Cody Glass might not be the solution. His $2.5 million cap hit for another year feels like a step backward after the team worked hard to offload Miles Wood at a similar cost. Ironically, Wood actually aligns better with the Avalanche’s needs than Glass, making this a head-scratching move. Do you agree, or is there more to Glass’s potential fit than meets the eye?
Brendan Dillon, on the other hand, is a more compelling option. At 35, with a $4 million cap hit for one more year after this season, Dillon isn’t your typical depth defenseman. As a left-handed shot, he’d likely slot into the third pairing, which raises another contentious point: trading Samuel Girard. Yes, you read that right. Acquiring Dillon might mean parting ways with Girard, either in the same deal or separately. Is trading Girard a risk worth taking, or is he too valuable to let go? Dillon’s size (6’4”, 225 lbs) and physical presence address a need for the Avalanche, but he’s not a perfect fit. Still, he could be a solid addition to the blue line, even if he’s not the ideal choice.
Glendon shifts the focus to the center position, asking whether the Avalanche should stick with Drury as the 3C and instead upgrade the third-line wingers and fourth-line center. And this is the part most people miss... Centers are expensive, and the market isn’t exactly overflowing with options. Ideally, a true 3C would be the best move, especially after seeing J.T. Compher step into the top six during Nazem Kadri’s injury in 2022. Drury, while serviceable, might struggle if suddenly thrust into that role. Is Drury the right man for the job, or should the Avalanche aim higher?
If the Avalanche opt for a 4C instead, players like David Kampf or Michael McCarron could fit the bill. As for a seventh defenseman, someone reliable but not necessarily an everyday player—think Jack Johnson in 2022—would suffice. But here’s the real question: Should the Avalanche prioritize a 3C or focus on bolstering the wings and fourth line?
Sasha Landprecht brings up another critical point: Will the Avalanche target rentals or players with term? This is where it gets tricky... The Avalanche likely prefer players with term, but only if their contracts are short and cap-friendly. With Cale Makar’s contract expiring after next season and his extension not possible until July 1, the team needs to keep their cap situation flexible. For example, a player like Dillon, with his $4 million cap hit, wouldn’t be a long-term fit if it interferes with Makar’s new deal. Should the Avalanche prioritize short-term gains or play it safe for the future?
In the end, the Avalanche’s trade deadline strategy will hinge on balancing immediate needs with long-term goals. What’s your take? Are they better off making bold moves now, or should they play it safe for the future? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments!
